It Can’t Happen Here: A Novel for Our Times (and All Time)

by Bob Freville

 

“And I’ve got good news for you! This gospel of clean and aggressive strength is spreading everywhere in this country among the finest type of youth. Why today, in 1936, there’s less than 7 percent of collegiate institutions that do not have military-training units under discipline as rigorous as the Nazis, and where once it was forced upon them by the authorities, now it is the strong young men and women who themselves demand the right to be trained in warlike virtues and skill—for, mark you, the girls, with their instruction in nursing and the manufacture of gas masks and the like, are becoming every whit as zealous as their brothers. And all the really thinking type of professors are right with ’em!”

 

This is one of the hallmark passages from the first chapter of Sinclair Lewis’s classic work of speculative fiction, It Can’t Happen Here. The dense political satire was first published in 1935, but those words might as well be about the panic that attends our nation after every school shooting or public upset.

The reactionary thinking that is discussed above could just as easily be read as a premonition of the move toward an armed high school faculty or the Alt-Right movement on college campuses across America.

When we talk about the great satirists of yesteryear, the word “prescient” gets thrown around ad nauseam. We’ve rightly applied it to figures as diverse as Aldous Huxley, George Orwell and even Ray Bradbury. Unfortunately, it is an appropriate word to describe Lewis’s novel as well.

For the sake of this post, let’s substitute the word “visionary” since that is just as suitable. It Can’t Happen Here is a sort of bitter visionary comedy of errors, one in which the mania of the nation leads to the appointment of a shifty state senator as Commander-in-Chief.

Buzz Windrip is the buffoon that is elected president and his election results in America becoming a fascist dictatorship. If this sounds at all familiar, you can be excused for thinking so. Just as Robert Anton Wilson’s Schrodinger’s Cat Trilogy masterfully foresaw the reign of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney nearly thirty years before said reign came to pass, It Can’t Happen Here seems like one man’s panicked prediction of the Trump administration.

The book reads like a survivor’s account of where the world will end up both today and tomorrow. What is truly terrifying is the way in which it seems to chronicle the last several years. Windrip as a villain is equal parts Barack Obama and Donald Trump.

The character starts out as an idealistic liberal, not unlike Barack during his first term, but he quickly morphs into something else under the counsel of those who have his ear. This is one of the most perturbing elements of the novel’s plot—the very obvious notion that a Democratic leader with essentially good intentions or ideas can become a fascist if powerful people persuade or otherwise put the screws to him. This recalls the same seemingly benign totalitarianism we saw from New York Democratic Mayor Di Blasio who wanted to tell residents of the Big Apple what size soft drinks they were allowed to drink.

It also recalls Obama’s renewal of the abominable National Defense Authorization Act which has been used to silence naysayers in the press as much as it has to imprison and torture terror suspects. As much as President Windrip comes to resemble the Orange One later in the book, it is notable that he seems so erudite at the book’s start.

After all, it’s unlikely that you’ll find Trump spewing anything nearly as articulate as “I feel constrained to say here that the most elementary perusal of the Economy of Abundance would convince any intelligent student the the Cassandras who miscall the much-needed increase in the fluidity of our currential circulation ‘Inflation’…” Obama was another story, a smooth talker who ran on a platform of change one could believe in.

But it is Trump’s America that seems most clearly represented in the pages of this landmark novel. Early on, he denounces all “Fascism” and “Naziism” so that “most of the Republicans who were afraid of Democratic Fascism, and all the Democrats who were afraid of Republican Fascism, were ready to vote for him.”

If this doesn’t seem reminiscent of the way that Trump mobilized young Conservatives to vote out of fear of Bernie Sanders’ brand of Socialism and managed to sway Democrats who were afraid of another Bush regime, I don’t know what does.

The heartbeat of the book is Doremus Jessup, a newspaperman who represents the Free Press. A libertarian-leaning Lefty, Jessup favors a good-natured isolationism over the police state thinking of the political opposition. When he writes a scathing editorial about the Windrip administration at the urging of his activist mistress, this “tentative liberal” is thrown in jail.

If this, too, sounds familiar it’s because it’s commensurate to how our current president has repeatedly violated free speech by blocking critics on social media, threatening to eliminate press briefings, and openly  demeaning journalists.

I first read It Can’t Happen Here during then-President George W. Bush’s second term in the White House. At the time, I could draw certain parallels between the commander-in-chief IRL and the fictional Windrip, but they were far less striking than they are this time around.

For starters, Dubya didn’t seem to speak for the filthy rich in quite the same way as Buzz does in the book. While it was a matter of public record that Dubya had enjoyed an Ivy League education where he belonged to the same fraternal order as his father before him, we knew that he resided on an austere ranch when he wasn’t occupying the Oval.

In short, Junior didn’t strike the same kind of nefarious billionaire image that Trump did/does, rather he was our cowboy president who looked and sounded like the working class. This was the leader of the free world in a pair of Levis and some Stetsons.

Windrip fits the Trump mould more acutely than any other US president, promising not just prosperity but obscene wealth to all of his constituents. This is classic Trumpspeak, the kind of stumping where the candidate in question swears that the people will have great jobs and better pay then takes credit for other people’s generosity and job creation once he’s sworn in.

Like Trump, Windrip is described as a teetotaler who doesn’t sleep much. The parallels don’t end there either. As the story progresses, we meet the shadowy cabal of handlers surrounding Windrip, figures like the manipulative Colonel Haik who campaigns for Windrip in odd places like coal mines and fishing fleets, ensuring that the little people get behind his man.

Speaking at “lunatic asylums,” prisons and crossroad churches, Haik rhapsodizes about Windrip’s “gallant but ludicrous efforts to learn to fly.” It’s the kind of aggrandizement typical of the Trump campaign and, indeed, Trump himself.

In the last three years, we have bore witness to the president’s innumerable moments of verbal masturbation, cringing, crying and sometimes laughing in sheer exasperation at the amount of times that one man can tell you how incredible he thinks he is. Trump wouldn’t know a humble brag if it leaped up and fucked his face.

Windrip is equally loquacious; each chapter of the book starts off with an excerpt from one of his speeches. His reasoning in some of these matters is uncannily that of The Donald. For example, he manages to pat himself on the back for being an imbecile thanks to some rather shrewd rationalization.

“When I was a kid,” Windrip says.  “one time I had an old-maid teacher that used to tell me, ‘Buzz, you’re the thickest-headed dunce in school.’ But I noticed that she told me this a whole lot oftener than she used to tell the other kids how smart they were, and I came to be the most talked-about scholar in the whole township. The United States Senate isn’t so different, and I want to thank a lot of stuffed shirts for their remarks about Yours Truly.”

It is interesting to note that Trump was registered as a Democrat for many years and fed the coffers of candidates like the Clintons before turning on them like a feral bitch when running in 2016. In the book, Buzz Windrip runs on the Democratic ticket and he runs against none other than Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

A defiant Roosevelt says something that couldn’t be more true of Trump’s nomination. He asserts that Windrip has been chosen “not by the brains or hearts of genuine Democrats but by their temporarily crazed emotions.”

It’s a sentiment that is echoed elsewhere in Lewis’s novel when newspaper editor Doremus Jessup speaks of the hysteria that leads to fascism. It’s the kind of hysteria we saw back in ‘16 when a relative mob of Bernie supporters were left devastated by his resignation from the race.

It was clear from his post-resignation remarks that Ole Bern had been bought out by Hillary Rodham Clinton who then took her place as the Democratic front-runner. It’s no surprise that a younger generation weaned on internet conspiracy theories and memes were none too pleased to find that their only choice was, as the South Park boys would end up putting it, a Giant Douche and a Turd Sandwich.

Bernie had managed to mobilize millennials who eagerly espoused the idea of a more radical president who would pay for their higher education and get them fair wages at their McJobs. So, what to do in their state of panic? Turn to the only radical candidate left, a man who also promises to raise the minimum wage and swears that he’ll “make America great again.”

As Doremus realizes in the novel, the dismaying preference for the theoretically Democratic Buzz Windrip “wasn’t even a pathetic trust in Windrip’s promises of Utopian bliss for everyone in general. It was a trust in increased cash for the voter himself, and for his family, very much in particular.”

In the book, Doremus excoriates Windrip for his “Minute Men,” a coterie of armed young boys not unlike many of the White Separatists we see showing up at Trump rallies. Doremus is both thrilled and dismayed when he sees these Minute Men in person or, as he puts it, “the printed words made brutal flesh.”

It’s a sentiment that we can all share when we start to feel a little too fanatical about our own opposition. It’s one thing to believe that a leader is a bigoted, misogynistic and deceitful criminal who is backed by other lying bigoted misogynists from fly over states. It’s another to actually seem them turn up in public to confirm for the rest of us their own ignorance and insanity.

Windrip is later revealed to be a racist who’s no fan of the “Jews” and comes out hard against “niggers.” Far from losing points in the polls, this only wins him more proponents. And as if the racist lyrics of “Yankee Doodle” weren’t damning enough already, here it is turned into a campaign song with a young lady singing, “Buzz and Buzz and keep it up/To victory he’s floated/You were a most ungrateful pup/Unless for Buzz you voted.”

Later on, Windrip talks about “speechifying” which further recalls the mangled lexicon of 45, but it’s allusions to the press as being bogus that most readily legitimizes Lewis’s novel as one of timeless satirical appeal. Somehow, perhaps without even trying, its author has prophesied the term “fake news”.

There’s even a nod here to folks like Rudy Giuliani and Sarah Huckabee-Sanders who serve as President Trump’s information machine. In Windrip’s words, “An honest propagandist for any Cause, that is, one who honestly studies and figures out the most effective way of putting over his message, will learn fairly early that it is not fair to ordinary folks—it just confuses them—to try to make them swallow all the true facts that would be suitable to a higher class of people. And one seemingly small but almighty important point he learns, if he does much speechifying, is that you can win over folks to your point of view much better in the evening, when they are tired out from work and not so likely to resist you.”

This goes far towards explaining the popularity of evening Fox News programs and the late night Tweetathons of Herr Drumpf.

There are a lot more comments and sequences in It Can’t Happen Here that seem to mirror the Trump White House, such as a description of Windrip’s second-in-command that evokes an image of Mike Pence at his most pallid and sinister (“deep-buried eyes”) and Windrip insisting that they will take Mexico some day, but what is most alarming is the sense of impending doom.

It is best (or worst) embodied by a demand that “in order to bring and hold the elements in the country together” one must rely on  “that useful Patriotism which always appears upon the threat of an outside attack.” Tea time with North Korea, anyone?

There is much problematic about Lewis’s political nightmare, perhaps especially the way that Windrip’s form of bonkers fascism reaches its inevitable conclusion in an even more humorless form of Draconian law.

In the end, Windrip is replaced by a staunch Atheist who tells the people that they will not be making a fair wage, rather they will “reap the profits of Discipline and of the Scientific Totalitarian State not in mere paper figures but vast dividends of Pride, Patriotism and Power.”

As the chapter clearly states, Windrip and his Vice President didn’t mind mirth or dancing in the street “so long as they could be suitably taxed,” but Windrip’s successor “disliked such things on principle.”

The notion of Trump running for another term and winning is a scary enough thought, but the suggestion that he might be replaced by a leader who will treat the entire nation “like a well-run plantation” is an even more daunting one.

Or, perhaps, we’re already there and the titular “it” has already happened here. The ban on information late in the novel reminds one of Trump’s repeal of the FCC’s Internet privacy rule as well as his clear desire to silence the media.

Obfuscation, misinformation and suppression of facts have become mainstays in our nation’s capital. Hopefully, with any luck, we can endure these things and, eventually, outlive them like Doremus Jessup… because, as the novel says, “a Jessup can never die.”

Twitchy Kids & Dungeon Synth: An Interview with Justin A. Mank

Austin James: So word on the street is that you write books?
Justin A. Mank: Yeah man, guilty as charged. Done more poetry than prose up to this point, but I just had a novella come out so I’m taking the full stab at prose.
Oh yeah? When did you start writing poetry?
I started out like a lot of people writing embarrassing poetry when I was 15. I’m pretty sure all of that stuff has been destroyed. But I occasionally still messed with it in my early twenties and decided to put the work in and give it a real try.
Did you start reading other poets in your early twenties as you continued to play around with it?
Yeah, when I was real young I hadn’t really read much poetry—I only really knew lyricists. So I didn’t really know my shit. Later I started reading some of the classics. Samuel Beckett’s poetry had a big effect on me. His poetry is really underrated.
I’ll have to check him out. We actually have similar backgrounds in this sense. Who are some of your favorite lyricists?
Leonard Cohen, GG Allin, David Tibet, Ronnie James Dio, Nick Cave, Lydia Lunch. When I was younger, I was especially into the lyrics from metal bands like Evoken, Emperor, My Dying Bride, things of that nature.
Very cool. Have you ever had any of your poetry published?
Yeah, I’ve had three collections published. The last one The Outhouse is my City of God was self-published. The first two, Sigmoid Colon and The Hammerheaded Shark, were published by the Dynatox imprint Black Dharma Press.
Oh shit, so you’ve got a good chunk of poetry out there. What made you decide to publish Innermind Musclebound, which is fiction/prose?
Well I have a couple short stories out there, plus a novelette, but this one was a little more involved. I really wanted to do a disturbing book with a social commentary element, so I felt like a character study type book would be the way to go.
Wanna give it a plug?
It’s written sort of as the memoir of a scumbag who cares about one thing in life and that’s beating people up. He ends up developing this sort of code of conduct about it and has to figure out what to do after he gets injured. Gets weird at the end, but at its heart it’s an exploration of the mind of a terrible person or maybe a non-murderous sociopath.

Sounds great, and it’s a beautiful book…can’t wait to dig into it! What inspired you to write it?
I think just the fact that I read a bunch of messed up books in the last few years had me thinking of trying that out. Once I got going with it, other stuff started falling into place and I got really into the idea of doing a book that would make a mockery out of violent douche bags. But then, of course, I wanted to add some weirdness, so there’s some mystical shit in it, and then just the fact that there’s no dialogue in the book.
You mentioned a novelette earlier?
Yeah man, I did this weird fantasy story for Sleazy Viking Press called The Trickster and the Goblin King. Kind of a sexually explicit fantasy comedy with some dada influences.
How did your fans receive that, being that you were mostly a poet up until then?
I think pretty good, the dada thing might have freaked people out, but I like throwing people for a loop. But that was still the thing I did that was the closest to bizarro.
Sounds like you’re a fan of weird fiction?
You mean like Lovecraft or weird in general?
I dunno, Mank, where do you wanna take this?
Well you know, I like all manner of screwed up. From the literary stuff that’s fucked to the pulp stuff that’s pretty out there; funny shit, disturbing shit. I don’t like to put my eggs in one basket.
You brought up Lovecraft…is he one of your big influences?
I probably wouldn’t say he’s one of my biggest direct influences, but he’s still one of the writers who got me interested in digging around for unusual stuff in writing. You know because I read him when I was sixteen or whatever. But also his idiosyncrasies with the world building and all that. But I also like fucking with voice and writing style a lot which he was kind of against.
Good point. So who would you cite as direct influences?
I think probably Samuel Beckett and Antonin Artaud. Just the way they were striving for some seriously deep shit, practically destroying the language to do it, but there’s still a poignancy and humor. But definitely some contemporary writers who I’m friends with have had a big impact, especially Justin Grimbol, Philip LoPresti and Jordan Krall. There’s no denying that those guys’s books kind of reeled me in a different direction than where I was at before.
Now that you’ve put out some fiction, are you still writing poetry or have you basically changed over?
Hard to say really. I definitely don’t think I’ll decide to switch totally over to more traditional narratives. But I’m also working on some stuff that’s not quite traditional poetry either, trying to go weirder in the future.
What about “the weird” draws you when you create your art?
I was a twitchy weird kid and I guess that laid the foundation for me to naturally drift towards these things. During my angsty phase I was more interested in things that were disturbing, but as I lightened up, I moved more towards just unusual stuff. In terms of weird writing, I feel like a good and crazy book has the potential to warp the internal monologue, and that’s just damn cool.
Ha! Ha! True. So basically, twitchy weird kids = disturbed teens = adult miscreants…
You could say that. At least in terms of an interest in off the wall films and books and stuff. I’m probably not too unique in that sense if you look at our colleagues. Just guessing.
My kid is weird. And twitchy. I’m just hoping he avoids rehab and/or incarceration.
Oh man, well I don’t know if I’d worry that much. It was tough being the weirdest kid when I was younger but now I’m glad about it. Learned to put it in a different perspective.
I was an outcast as well, for the most part. And my kid’s probably not any twitchier than other weird kids. Anyway, tell me about your other passion: music…
Been doing music a little longer than writing. I’m still kind of the new guy in the writing world. But my main project lately has been Ranseur which is a harsh noise-influenced dungeon synth project. So like metal oriented fantasy synthesizer stuff.
Yeah? Forgive my musical ignorance, but care to dumb that down a bit for me?
It’s a style of synth playing that came out of black metal. If you take metal with keys and take out the metal that’s pretty much dungeon synth.
Alright, so what instruments does it take to create this specific art form?
Just keys essentially. You can add a little dash of other instruments or vocals but a lot of it is straight up just keys.
One man band style?
Yeah for the most part, there’s exceptions though. But I was doing a one-man black metal band before this so it goes with the territory.
Oh, cool. Again, forgive the naivety, but does that make you a DJ?
No, I only play instruments, never used that sort of gear or tried that approach. I pretty much sit down at the keys and let the weirdness flow. But this is totally from a high fantasy kind of perspective, in terms of what the songs are about.
Vocals as well?
Yeah I sing a little, not in that particular project. Have sang in a few noise rock bands, used to do a little folk.
You get many gigs?
I used to do more solo gigs, did a couple lately but not so regularly. But I gig a fair amount with a noise rock group Human Adult Band. Might as well mention that we just had an LP come out called Sonic Enlightenment on Third Uncle Records.
Hell yeah man! That’s exciting news—plug away! Being that you have a bit of “performer” in your blood, do you also get out and do a lot of poetry readings or anything?
Not too much. I have done a couple readings and I do try to sell books at gigs for music. But I’ve been kind of nervous to even try to show up to a more literary poetry thing or whatever. I feel like I’d get thrown out the door. Maybe stand up people would like it better, who knows?
If I were to try to live readings of my poetry, I’d need to book it at a comedy club. Ha. So you’ve sold books at gigs? That’s badass!
Yeah I have a little. I don’t do too much of the con thing, so it’s another to try to get the stuff out there.
It’s brilliant, if you ask me.
Just something I randomly tried while selling albums. People like to leaf through stuff. You see some funny reactions just because of the content, but I’ve had a few people get excited about it. Some musicians I didn’t even know were also writers have checked it out, so that got the conversation going in the direction of writing which is cool.
Next thing you know, you’ll be slinging albums at book readings
I have.
Yeah? So you’re just out there making music and printing words and getting that shit out in the street…what’s next?
I have no clue really. Tried comics but I kind of gave up, the formatting stuff is hard and I got lazy. I’m working on a really strange fantasy book, if all goes well it should be a bigger project. But I’m leaning heavy on some experimental techniques for that one so we’ll see what happens. Not much nonlinear fantasy out there, but this is kind of more prose poetry anyway.
Sounds cool, to be honest. What kind of “fantasy” are you talking about?
Some kind of high fantasy, and I might cut the transgressive thing for this. But I’m still not sure how traditional it’ll be. Trying to fuck with some world building here and not just rest on the pure Tolkien thing.
Are there vorpal swords?
Nah I kind of want to make up my own weird swords and stuff. But there’s gonna be like gnomes and elves in it.


How far are you into this project?
It’s been a long work in progress for a while. Main idea is using hypnotic repetition in writing. But it more recently occurred to me that it needs a more serious world building element to really work. It’s about figuring out how to use these techniques for results that really matters.
One thing I like about poets who start dabbling in prose is how they look at word play as something to challenge and run with. I really dig the idea of “hypnotic repetition in writing”.
I probably shouldn’t say too much about this, because there’s always a chance it won’t work. But I’ve been working on this on the side for five or six years. Trying to do these kind of mantras but instead of being religious they’re related to fictional things. But I really want to bring that kind of Avant Garde thing into speculative fiction territory.
Can you share an example?
I’d rather keep it mysterious for now. It’s the kind of thing that seems really easy to do, but I’ve found it hard to do in a way that makes me feel like it’s ready to be out there publicly. I guess I feel that way about all minimalist writing. But reading Alfred Starr Hamilton has helped a lot. Way out there poet who used some really odd repetition.
I completely understand, bro! Can’t blame me for trying though—I like to pretend I’m a cutting edge journalist. I’ll have to check Alfred Star Hamilton…any suggestions on where to start?
A Dark Dreambox of Another Kind is pretty much his only book. He was a mentally ill poet from New Jersey who haphazardly sent poetry around and a lot of times he never made a copy. So most of his stuff is lost. One of those poets who might be famous in two hundred years but not so much now. But there’s a short book of letters that’s unbelievable.
I certainly dig that your constantly pushing the boundaries of how/what you create. But let’s get down to brass tacks…with a name like Mank, you should be a short, bull-doggy kind of guy. Yet a meager amount of social media stalking reveals that you’re a tall and skinny stoner looking dude. Explain yourself!
Yeah I’m skinny as hell, fast metabolism kind of shit. But stoner no, I’m more of a magick kind of guy. Mank is a strange German name, comes from my dad’s side. Old puritan kind of lineage from Maine. But I identify more as Irish in the American sense anyway. There is, in fact, another Justin Mank who is an artist which is why I started using the middle initial.
Well, that and Samuel L Jackson. I always thought it was cool how he writes his name out formally but he’s like this really badass guy.
Haha, fair enough. Alright bro, anything else you’d like to bring up or plug before we wrap this thing up?
I guess I might plug one more thing, this tape that’s about to come out on the Brave Mysteries label, Boggart’s Field – Sidhe Folk. Kind of a fantasy / occult synthesizer album. Real weird side music project, might be a good primer for possible fantasy books in the future.
Right on man, it’s been fun chatting with you a bit. Thanks for your time!
Thanks for having me man, appreciate you taking the time.

Welcome to Leeds! (And Please Ignore the Quiet Weeping in the Woods): An Interview with Matthew Bartlett

When I asked Matthew Bartlett if he’d like to do an interview with Silent Motorist Media, I hadn’t read his work. Other writers I admire kept mentioning him, so I knew he’d be a good fit. I wasn’t prepared, however, for the binge read Gateways to Abomination would inspire. Bartlett’s work is unsettling, unique and an absolute joy to read. I can’t wait to dive into the rest of his oeuvre, and we’ll certainly be keeping tabs on him here at SMM. If you, as I was before this interview, are unfamiliar with the world of Leeds and WXXM, I encourage you change that immediately. Stop by Bartlett’s Amazon author page, pick up Gateways to Abomination, Creeping Waves, and his newest collection, The Stay-Awake Men and Other Unstable Entities. You won’t regret it.

-Justin A. Burnett

“I consider myself still very much a student when I read. Which isn’t to say I don’t enjoy reading, I do. But part of my mind is always working in the background to try to learn how to improve.”

-Matthew Bartlett

Justin A. Burnett: For this interview, I read began by reading Gateways to Abomination. Like many other readers, I was completely blown away. I went on to read Creeping Waves because I just couldn’t get enough of Leeds. Before I began, I wondered how you would manage to follow up on such a great start. Sure enough, I was blown away again. How did the mysterious world of Leeds and the WXXM radio station begin for you?

Matthew Bartlett: A friend of mine had started a Livejournal account separate from his personal account, and the new account consisted of humorous, fictional stories about a small town and its people. I loved the idea of using Livejournal for fiction.

I was a lifelong reader of horror, and I’d recently become kind of obsessed with Joe Frank’s innovative radio shows, so the concept of mixing horror and radio occurred to me almost instantly. The first WXXT post was on my personal page–I wrote that I was driving up to Leeds (a small village that’s part of Northampton, where I live) and hearing odd radio broadcasts. In that post I linked to the WXXT page, and it went from there.

There was no reason for me to think at the time that these stories would be read by anyone other than my twenty or so Livejournal friends. I wrote them in short bursts. This was in mid-2004, I think.

Leeds itself, in my fiction, is a stand-in for Northampton, but has territories from dozens of places I’ve lived and worked. East Hartford, where I grew up. Simsbury, Connecticut, where I worked for a year. Old Saybrook. Stratford. Montague and Leominster and Fitchburg, Massachusetts.

Burnett: Does any Northampton local lore play into the stories and vignettes that make up Creeping Waves and Gateways?

Bartlett: Only in the sense that I use real events and pictures to concoct stranger, darker, more demonic versions of the city’s history. There is, a little up the road from me, a sort of minimalist Victorian village of cottages in the woods, situated around a tabernacle. It started as a tent community of Methodists in the late 1800s. I’ve used that setting in several stories, but altered its roots and gussied up its history. I use a lot of old local pictures from antique stores to inspire stories as well. But most everything from my stories is the product of my imagination. I do read up on local lore, but I don’t use it directly, It’s just in my head when I write.

Burnett: There’s definitely something inherently creepy about a minimalist village of cottages which once was a tent community surrounding a tabernacle. The “tent gathering” pieces were among the most memorable, to me.

While Creeping Waves and Gateways are thematically unified, there is a noticeable difference in length and level of detail between them. Could you describe your evolution as a writer as you returned to Leeds with Creeping Waves?

Bartlett: I wrote the stories in Gateways between 2004 and 2013 or thereabouts. When I assembled the pieces I used for that book, I deliberately left some out, intending to use them in an eventual follow-up. In the months after the release of Gateways, I began to write longer, more traditional stories for the first time, wanting very much to have my stories in anthologies. I hadn’t thought myself able to write long stories, so I basically taught myself how to do it.

When it came time to assemble the stories I wanted in Creeping Waves, I had the old Livejournal stories and these new longer pieces. I felt I needed new vignettes and stories to round out the book, so I started writing new stuff specifically for the book. By that time I was writing every day, something I had not done during the ten-year span during which I wrote Gateways. It was a natural evolution.

Burnett: You have a new collection, The Stay-Awake Men and Other Unstable Entities, that came out after I had done my reading for this interview. Do you want to say a few words about it? Is it more Leeds, or a venture into new territory?

Bartlett: It’s a collection of unconnected stories. Some take place in Leeds, but it’s not related to the WXXT story line. There’s a story of a supermarket meat manager with strange occult powers, a magician’s apprentice, a company whose middle management is replaced by mannequins. These are more “traditional” weird fiction stories, if that word means anything when it comes to weird fiction.

Burnett: Excellent! I’m looking forward to reading it. I noticed you have a Patreon as well. Do you regularly post Leeds-related short pieces on that as well?

Bartlett: I occasionally post Leeds-related short pieces, along with audio clips of my reading stories or parts of stories, some not yet published, old poems and articles I wrote, and some surprises.

Burnett: It sounds like just the right place for readers who can’t get enough of your work. When I read Gateways and Creeping Waves, the thing that stuck out to me immediately was that you seemed to have fun writing them. There’s a delightful breeziness in your prose and a seamless association of vivid images that, to me, seems to indicate a level of excitement on your part. Is this accurate? Do you find yourself enveloped in these strange worlds when you sit down to write? If so, do you find that there’s a correlation between the quality of your work and the level of enjoyment you find in the writing process?

Bartlett: The stories that appeared in Gateways were written with no expectation of readers beyond a few friends. I wrote them between 2004 and 2013 or so, as Livejournal entries. They weren’t written out of obligation, and I had no deadlines. So, yes, they were written to amuse myself and some friends, and the process was a lot of fun.

When the book came out and began to receive some attention, I knew that in order to grow a career, I would have to dig in and teach myself to write longer, more structured stories. I still had fun doing them, but there was an element of hard work, too. Those longer stories did not come easily, and I read and wrote a lot in the service of growing as a writer so that I could achieve my goal of selling stories and building a viable career.

When the time came to put together Creeping Waves, the follow-up, I had some pieces from the blog that hadn’t gone into Gateways, and I had some of these longer, more structured stories that had appeared in various anthologies. But I needed more short pieces and interstitial bits.

So, what I tried to do was recreate the frame of mind I was in when I wrote those old Livejournal entries. I was a little worried that I couldn’t do it. But I liked how they came out, which was a good sign.

So in my current writing, I see a line between the hard-fought stories that require a lot of heavy work, and the pieces that just seem to roll out of my fingers onto the keyboard. I’m lucky to be able to do both, I think, and I consider myself still very much a student when I read. Which isn’t to say I don’t enjoy reading, I do. But part of my mind is always working in the background to try to learn how to improve.

Burnett: That you can write the “hard-fought” stories alongside the easier, “fun” pieces and still make both read effortlessly is an amazing testimony to your writing capabilities, in my opinion.

You seem to write one part horror, one part weird fiction, and one part your own unique space that I can’t think of any obvious genre comparisons to describe. I’m not crazy about thinking in terms of genre, but are there any writers out there with whom you feel a particular stylistic or thematic affinity?

Bartlett: I definitely feel a kinship with Jon Padgett. We seem to share a similar bent and a compatible aesthetic. I’d also say Scott Thomas, both in the old New England settings in many of his short fiction, as well as the strange weirdness in his masterpiece the Sea of Ash. There is also a definite affinity with Daniel Mills, Richard Gavin, a few others.

Burnett: This isn’t the first time I’ve heard a writer mention Gavin in positive terms. I definitely need to check this fellow out.

From what I can tell, you seem to be a writer who seeks to further develop your craft rather than remain in the same place. Do you have any ultimate “goals” with your work? What would it look like, to you, to have reached a place where you’ve done what you set out to do with fiction?

Bartlett: I don’t have any kind of an endgame in mind, besides producing a good body of work. I’d like to produce more experimental fiction using unexpected formats or frameworks. I’d like to improve my ability to write traditional short stories as well. I want to try a flat-out horror novel. I want to try an experimental novel and a “mature” horror novel. My goal in general is to contribute something of value to the genre I’m in love with.

Burnett: Excellent! I was just about to ask if a novel might be in the future.

Is there anything lined up in the near-future you’d like to share with readers? What can we anticipate from the Bartlett universe?

Bartlett: I’m working on a serial called “The Obsecration” for Broken Eye books. Two segments have been published so far on their Patreon. I’m currently working on the sixth and final segment, which I should have completed by the end of August. It takes place in the Leeds universe.

While working on this I’ve been writing a few short stories on the side. A story I’m very proud of will be included in Uncertainties 3, from Swan River Press this September. I’ll be announcing another acceptance soon, a story with strong ties to the serial. I’ll soon be working with Yves Tourigny on a second installment of The Witch Cult in Western Massachusetts [check out volume one here]. In 2019 I’m planning to shop around a collection.

T. E. Grau’s I Am The River: A Review

I Am The River - Cover - May 15, 2018

You don’t come back from a war alone. Anyone who knows a combat veteran will confirm this. The past, provided it suffers sufficient agitation, is a restless entity, forever disrupting the causal linearity most of us take for granted. “Every love story is a ghost story,” David Foster Wallace wrote in his final novel, The Pale King. We could readily add that every war story is a ghost story too.

T. E. Grau’s I Am The River is certainly a ghost story insofar as it is best understood in the cyclical causality of trauma. The past doesn’t stay put; it weaves in and out of the narrative like a surgeon’s knife, severing Broussard, the protagonist, from his surroundings and implanting him in cavities of experience presumably left behind. Vietnam strangled the lives of many a young soldier with their own histories–like Broussard, they didn’t quite go home, even those who, unlike Broussard, did.

Broussard lives in Bangkok, tethered to an unanswerable question and walled by the roar of the river. Memories of a night gone horribly wrong belch from the black sludge of the past as he tries to stay awake, since to sleep is to visit the realm of ghosts. One ghost in particular, a savage hound, shadows Broussard’s wanderings for a chance to press the life from him. There is no rest for Broussard, the shamed last soldier of an undocumented squad in neutral territory burdened with an incomprehensible mission. The past stretches into the horizon and beyond, like a black fog rising from a jungle without end.

For readers of Grau’s acclaimed collection, The Nameless Dark, a few elements in I Am The River will seem familiar. Broussard’s self-imposed exile due to accusations of cowardice will evoke Capitan Chilton in “White Feather.” Even the feather itself has made its way into these pages. Reader’s shouldn’t expect, however, more Lovecraftian mythos in I Am The River. Grau is stretching into Joseph Conrad’s territory here, with his sensibility for deep horror and impenetrable mystery always close at hand to bring the literary element to the fore.

I Am The River is an astoundingly well-crafted, compelling, and delightfully unsettling affair. Grau’s talent for setting is as palpable as ever; the jungle of Vietnam is everywhere, like an insidious fantasy that you dare not articulate, even on the reeking city streets of Bangkok. His penchant for deeply tormented characters unfurls in full color, as does his flair for the nightmare. If you are one of the many readers who enjoyed The Nameless Dark, you won’t leave disappointed. For newcomers to Grau in search of literary weirdness in a mode similar to Michael Wehunt and Brian Evenson, this is an excellent place begin.

All this is certainly enough to justify a review, but what really recommends I Am The River is Grau’s sentences. Take the first one, for instance: “I need to hide in plain sight, here at the dead center of the world, for just a little while longer” (9). Grau’s “dead center” lodged between two clauses–a dead center itself–beautifully balances the well-deployed cliche of hiding in plain sight against the necessity of holding out “a little while longer.” The sentence deteriorates on the other side of “dead center” with a waning dependent clause, imitating the dissipation of resolve, the lagging will to live in the face of the recurring night terror of Broussard’s living history.

On the following page, Grau writes: “The doctor would see me last, because I was estrangier and demanded extra scrutiny. A ripening underneath a secret gaze” (10). A ripening underneath a secret gaze. Peel the phrase apart. Feel the “ripening” evoke the sweet and bitter blend of fruits swelling below their distended husks. Let “underneath” bury the ripening fruit beneath the earth, while “secret” hollows out a room, white and placid like those used for criminal interrogations. You are left with “gaze,” a secret one, no less. When you find yourself at the end of the sentence, you are alienated from what was tossed, sickeningly, like a plum splitting with rot, into your hands. You imagine a secret gaze, the distorted screen of a recorded criminal’s confession. You wake up in a nightmare, as Broussard has and will again.

With I Am The River, Grau blossoms into a fully accomplished voice in literary horror (or, perhaps, the literary weird). My resolve to keep track of his writing career is stronger now than ever. For readers who prefer their horror fiction to ring with a little depth (but not too much), or for readers who simply enjoy a story that sucks you in and doesn’t let you free, I Am The River is for you. This is certainly, from what I’ve read so far, the finest release of 2018.

-Justin A. Burnett

T. E. Grau’s I Am The River: A Review

I Am The River - Cover - May 15, 2018

You don’t come back from a war alone. Anyone who knows a combat veteran will confirm this. The past, provided it suffers sufficient agitation, is a restless entity, forever disrupting the causal linearity most of us take for granted. “Every love story is a ghost story,” David Foster Wallace wrote in his final novel, The Pale King. We could readily add that every war story is a ghost story too.

T. E. Grau’s I Am The River is certainly a ghost story insofar as it is best understood in the cyclical causality of trauma. The past doesn’t stay put; it weaves in and out of the narrative like a surgeon’s knife, severing Broussard, the protagonist, from his surroundings and implanting him in cavities of experience presumably left behind. Vietnam strangled the lives of many a young soldier with their own histories–like Broussard, they didn’t quite go home, even those who, unlike Broussard, did.

Broussard lives in Bangkok, tethered to an unanswerable question and walled by the roar of the river. Memories of a night gone horribly wrong belch from the black sludge of the past as he tries to stay awake, since to sleep is to visit the realm of ghosts. One ghost in particular, a savage hound, shadows Broussard’s wanderings for a chance to press the life from him. There is no rest for Broussard, the shamed last soldier of an undocumented squad in neutral territory burdened with an incomprehensible mission. The past stretches into the horizon and beyond, like a black fog rising from a jungle without end.

For readers of Grau’s acclaimed collection, The Nameless Dark, a few elements in I Am The River will seem familiar. Broussard’s self-imposed exile due to accusations of cowardice will evoke Capitan Chilton in “White Feather.” Even the feather itself has made its way into these pages. Reader’s shouldn’t expect, however, more Lovecraftian mythos in I Am The River. Grau is stretching into Joseph Conrad’s territory here, with his sensibility for deep horror and impenetrable mystery always close at hand to bring the literary element to the fore.

I Am The River is an astoundingly well-crafted, compelling, and delightfully unsettling affair. Grau’s talent for setting is as palpable as ever; the jungle of Vietnam is everywhere, like an insidious fantasy that you dare not articulate, even on the reeking city streets of Bangkok. His penchant for deeply tormented characters unfurls in full color, as does his flair for the nightmare. If you are one of the many readers who enjoyed The Nameless Dark, you won’t leave disappointed. For newcomers to Grau in search of literary weirdness in a mode similar to Michael Wehunt and Brian Evenson, this is an excellent place begin.

All this is certainly enough to justify a review, but what really recommends I Am The River is Grau’s sentences. Take the first one, for instance: “I need to hide in plain sight, here at the dead center of the world, for just a little while longer” (9). Grau’s “dead center” lodged between two clauses–a dead center itself–beautifully balances the well-deployed cliche of hiding in plain sight against the necessity of holding out “a little while longer.” The sentence deteriorates on the other side of “dead center” with a waning dependent clause, imitating the dissipation of resolve, the lagging will to live in the face of the recurring night terror of Broussard’s living history.

On the following page, Grau writes: “The doctor would see me last, because I was estrangier and demanded extra scrutiny. A ripening underneath a secret gaze” (10). A ripening underneath a secret gaze. Peel the phrase apart. Feel the “ripening” evoke the sweet and bitter blend of fruits swelling below their distended husks. Let “underneath” bury the ripening fruit beneath the earth, while “secret” hollows out a room, white and placid like those used for criminal interrogations. You are left with “gaze,” a secret one, no less. When you find yourself at the end of the sentence, you are alienated from what was tossed, sickeningly, like a plum splitting with rot, into your hands. You imagine a secret gaze, the distorted screen of a recorded criminal’s confession. You wake up in a nightmare, as Broussard has and will again.

With I Am The River, Grau blossoms into a fully accomplished voice in literary horror (or, perhaps, the literary weird). My resolve to keep track of his writing career is stronger now than ever. For readers who prefer their horror fiction to ring with a little depth (but not too much), or for readers who simply enjoy a story that sucks you in and doesn’t let you free, I Am The River is for you. This is certainly, from what I’ve read so far, the finest release of 2018.

-Justin A. Burnett